Contact

What This Conversation Is For

Most inquiries that come through this page fall into one of a handful of situations. Recognizing which one matches your firm helps frame what the first conversation should focus on.

• A firm that is not getting enough case leads from search. Traffic might exist, or might not, but the phone is not ringing with the volume or quality of cases the firm needs. This is often a mix of weak rankings for the practice areas that actually matter and a site that does not convert the visitors it does get.
• A firm with weak authority compared to stronger competitors in the market. The site might be well built and the content might be solid, but competitors with years of accumulated backlinks and domain history are simply outranking it for the terms that bring in cases. This is a longer-term problem with a longer-term solution, and it is worth being direct about that from the first call.
• A firm with poor visibility in the cities where it takes cases. A firm might rank fine in its home city but be invisible in the surrounding metro areas or secondary markets it actually serves. This usually points to a gap in city-specific pages, local citations, or Google Business Profile management.
• A site that gets traffic but weak lead quality. This is a different problem from low traffic. It usually means the site is attracting the wrong kind of searcher, ranking for informational queries instead of the transactional ones that bring in real cases, or the site's content and calls to action are not doing enough to convert a visitor into an inquiry.
• A firm trying to understand how AI search tools are changing how people find a lawyer. More people are asking ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews for legal help before they ever run a normal search. Firms in this category usually want a plain answer about whether this actually matters yet for their market, and what, if anything, to do about it now.

The first conversation is not about forcing a firm into a retainer.

It is about figuring out the real issue behind the symptom, whether the fit between the firm's situation and the kind of work being offered is actually strong, and what kind of engagement makes sense given the firm's market, budget, and timeline.

Sometimes the honest answer is that a firm is not ready for ongoing SEO work yet, and a smaller, more scoped project makes more sense first.

Ways To Start

There are two practical ways to start this conversation, and which one fits depends on how much you already know about your situation and how you prefer to evaluate a potential fit.

Request a Loom Review

If you want an expert look at your site before committing to a live call, a Loom review is often the best first step.

This is a recorded screen-share walkthrough of your website and your current search visibility, covering what is working, what is likely holding you back, and where the clearest opportunities sit.

This works well when you want direct feedback on your site and its visibility problems without scheduling a meeting first.

It is a lower-friction starting point than a live call, especially if you are still in the early research phase and not ready to commit real time yet.

It also gives you clarity on whether your core problem is technical, content-related, authority-related, or tied to local visibility, before deciding what kind of engagement to pursue.

A Loom review is not a generic template applied to every firm. It is based on an actual look at your specific site, your specific market, and your specific competitors.

So the feedback reflects your real situation rather than a boilerplate list of common SEO issues.

Book a Strategy Call

A strategy call is the right choice when you want to talk through your market, your current position, and the likely path forward in real time, with room for back and forth questions.

This tends to work better once you already have a general sense of your problem and want to dig into specifics: what a realistic timeline looks like, what a competitive analysis of your market would show, or how a proposed engagement would actually be structured.

This is usually the better starting point for personal injury and mass tort firms competing in genuinely competitive markets. The strategic questions there are more complex and benefit from real-time discussion.

It also suits firms deciding between a one-time consulting project and full ongoing support, since that decision depends on details specific to the firm's situation that are easier to work through in conversation than in a recorded review.

Either path is a legitimate way to start. Neither one obligates you to anything beyond that first step.

Engagement Types Available

Once fit is established, the actual work generally takes one of a few shapes, depending on what the firm needs.

Monthly SEO support

This is ongoing SEO work for firms that need stronger rankings, more authority, better city-level visibility, and more consultations from the right kind of case over time.

This is the right fit for firms that understand SEO is a compounding, longer-term investment rather than a one-time fix, and want a consistent, ongoing effort behind their visibility in a competitive market.

Realistic timelines apply here: initial movement is generally visible around 90 days in, with fuller stabilization building out over 6 to 12 months as authority and content depth accumulate.

Project consulting

This is fixed-scope work for a specific, well-defined problem.

Examples include a technical SEO audit, a content strategy build-out for a set of practice area or case type pages, and a competitor analysis to understand exactly where a firm stands against the firms actually beating it in the market.

It can also be a growth roadmap that lays out a clear plan without necessarily including the execution of that plan.

This fits firms that want senior-level strategic input on a specific question before deciding on a bigger commitment, or firms with an internal team that can execute once given a clear, specific plan.

One-time technical review

For firms that mainly want a clear picture of where they stand right now, a one-time technical and content review covers the core issues: crawlability, indexing problems, schema and structured data gaps, content depth across key pages, and a basic look at authority relative to real competitors.

This does not include ongoing work, but it gives a firm an honest, specific baseline to work from, whether that work happens with this agency or elsewhere.

Helpful Context To Include

A strong inquiry usually includes your website URL and your practice areas, including which case types you actually want more of, not just a general category.

It includes your target cities, meaning where you actually want to be found, not just where your office happens to sit.

It also includes the main visibility or lead problem you want solved, described as specifically as you can, and what you have already tried, including any past SEO or marketing work and roughly how it went.

You do not need a polished brief or a formal document. A few direct sentences covering those points is enough to get a specific, useful answer back instead of a generic one. The more specific the inquiry, the more specific and useful the response can be.

A message that just says "we need more leads" gets a much less useful reply than one that says "we get decent traffic to our truck accident page but almost no calls from it, and we are getting outranked in two of our three target cities."

What Happens Next

After you reach out, you will get a direct answer about fit, likely priorities, and what kind of engagement makes sense given what you have described. This is not a sales funnel designed to get everyone onto a call regardless of fit.

If the fit is weak, meaning the firm's situation, budget, or timeline does not line up well with what this agency does, that will be said directly rather than strung along.

If the fit is strong, the next step is usually a strategy call, a Loom review, or in some cases a scoped proposal if the problem and the likely solution are already clear enough from the initial inquiry.

Because this agency works with a limited, focused set of clients at any given time rather than taking on every inquiry that comes through, being direct about fit early protects both sides from wasting time on a relationship that was never going to work well.

Who This Is Best For

The best fit is usually one of a few situations. A personal injury firm trying to improve case-intake visibility in a market where it currently underperforms relative to its actual quality of representation.

A mass tort firm trying to rank case-type pages for the way claimants actually search, using the real language people use when researching a specific drug, device, or exposure, rather than generic legal terminology.

Or a solo or small firm that wants senior strategy and direct communication instead of being handed off to a junior account manager inside a large, generic marketing agency fulfillment process.

This work is generally not a fit for firms outside personal injury and mass tort law, firms looking for guaranteed rankings or a fixed timeline, since no legitimate SEO work can ethically promise either, or firms that want the cheapest possible option rather than a genuine, sustained investment in visibility.

A Note on Realistic Expectations

Part of a genuinely useful first conversation is being honest about timelines and outcomes, not just enthusiastic about potential.

SEO for a personal injury or mass tort firm in a competitive market is not a fast process, and no legitimate provider can promise a guaranteed ranking or a fixed date by which results will appear.

State bar advertising rules exist for good reason around this kind of claim, and any firm hearing a guarantee from a marketing provider should treat that as a warning sign, not reassurance.

What is realistic is this: firms that commit to genuine, sustained SEO work typically see initial movement in rankings and visibility around the 90 day mark, with fuller results building out and stabilizing over roughly 6 to 12 months as authority accumulates and content matures.

Firms competing against long-established competitors with years of accumulated authority in a market should expect that gap to close over a longer stretch, often 2 to 3 years of consistent work, not a single quarter.

This is discussed openly in the first conversation, not glossed over, because a firm that goes in with realistic expectations makes better decisions about budget, timeline, and whether this is the right investment for where the firm currently stands.

What Makes This Conversation Different

Most agency sales processes are built to get every inquiry onto a call, then get every call onto a retainer, regardless of whether the fit is actually good.

That approach works fine for the agency's sales numbers and poorly for the firms that end up in a relationship that was never going to produce real results.

This works differently because the business only takes on a limited, focused number of clients at a time, rather than scaling up by adding as many accounts as possible. That structure changes the incentive.

There is no benefit to talking a firm with a poor fit into an engagement, because a poor fit engagement wastes both sides' time and does not lead to results either side can point to later.

A direct, honest answer about fit, even when that answer is "this is not a good match right now," is a better use of everyone's time than a polished pitch aimed at closing a deal regardless of whether it should close.

This also means response times and depth of attention on an active engagement tend to be higher than what a firm experiences with a larger agency managing dozens of accounts through a standardized process.

The tradeoff is that not every inquiry gets accepted, and that is intentional.

Common Questions Before Reaching Out

Do I need to already know what kind of SEO help I need?

No. Plenty of firms reach out with a general sense that something is not working, without being able to name the exact cause.

Describing the symptom, weak lead volume, poor visibility in a specific city, competitors that seem to be everywhere, is enough to start. Figuring out the actual underlying cause is part of what the first conversation is for.

What if I am currently working with another SEO provider?

That is fine to mention, and it is actually useful context. Knowing what has already been tried, what results it produced or did not produce, and why you are looking elsewhere helps shape a more specific, more honest first conversation.

Is there a cost for the Loom review or the strategy call?

Both the Loom review and the initial strategy call are free first steps meant to establish whether there is a real fit before any paid engagement begins. Neither one requires a commitment.

How quickly will I hear back?

Response times depend on current workload, but inquiries are read and answered directly, not routed through an automated sequence or a junior staff member first.

A specific, detailed inquiry generally gets a faster and more useful response than a vague one, simply because there is less back and forth needed to understand the situation.

What if my firm is not personal injury or mass tort?

This work is focused specifically on personal injury and mass tort firms, since that focus is what allows for real depth in understanding the case types, the search behavior, and the competitive landscape involved.

Firms outside that focus are usually better served by a more general legal marketing provider.

Before You Reach Out

If you want more context before sending a message, it can help to review a few other pages first. Law Firm SEO covers the overall approach to this work. Case Studies shows real examples of past work and results.

SEO for Lawyers and Attorneys goes deeper into how this applies specifically to legal practices. And Why We Do Not Promise 30 Day Rankings explains honestly why any firm promising fast, guaranteed results should raise a red flag, not confidence.

None of this is required reading before reaching out. It is there if you want more context before your first message.

Next Step

Use the form below or the scheduling options on this page. The more specific your inquiry, the more useful the response will be.